Back to Next Best Action (NBA) View Capability Diagrams

Next Best Action Optimization

Real-time decision engine recommending optimal customer interactions achieving 50-70% improvement in campaign response rates and 40-60% reduction in customer contact fatigue.

Business Outcome

time reduction in data preparation and model building

Complexity:

Medium

Time to Value:

3-6 months

Why This Matters

What It Is

Real-time decision engine recommending optimal customer interactions achieving 50-70% improvement in campaign response rates and 40-60% reduction in customer contact fatigue.

Current State

(Traditional)

1. Marketing runs 5 concurrent campaigns: email for product launch, SMS for flash sale, push notification for cart abandonment, direct mail for Loyalty System, survey request. 2. Customer receives all 5 communications in same week (campaign teams don't coordinate): 'Buy new product', 'Flash sale 20% off', 'Complete your purchase', 'Join Loyalty System', 'Take our survey'. 3. Customer overwhelmed by messages (contact fatigue), unsubscribes from email or marks as spam. 4. Sales rep calls customer for upsell opportunity, unaware customer just received 5 marketing messages and is annoyed. 5. No prioritization logic: all campaigns treated equally, highest-response opportunity unclear. 6. Campaign response rates decline over time: 8% → 5% → 3% as fatigue sets in. 7. Customer satisfaction drops (NPS -10 points) due to over-communication and irrelevant offers.

Characteristics

• Data Lakes
• Customer Data Platforms (CDPs) like mParticle
• Cloud-based analytics services (e.g., AWS Personalize)
• Machine Learning Frameworks (e.g., scikit-learn, TensorFlow)
• Decision Engines (e.g., Pega’s Next Best Action framework)
• ERP and CRM systems (e.g., Salesforce, Microsoft Dynamics)

Pain Points

⚠ Data Quality and Bias: Historical data often contains biases that can skew model predictions.
⚠ Complexity in Measuring Impact: Difficulties in quantifying the true incremental effect of each action before deployment.
⚠ Integration Challenges: Technical complexity in combining multiple data sources and integrating NBA recommendations into existing channels.
⚠ Resource Intensive: Significant data science expertise, time, and computational resources required for building and optimizing models.
⚠ Time to Value: Initial implementation can be time-consuming, although automation reduces manual intervention over time.
⚠ Scalability Issues: Scaling NBA systems across diverse customer segments can be challenging due to varying data quality and customer behavior.

Future State

(Agentic)

1. Next Best Action Agent analyzes customer profile: John Doe has abandoned cart ($250 value), eligible for Loyalty System, received product launch email yesterday (no open), survey pending. 2. Agent calculates propensity scores: Cart abandonment recovery 65% (high), Loyalty System enrollment 20% (low), survey response 10% (very low), new product purchase 15% (medium). 3. Agent prioritizes by revenue potential: Cart abandonment = $250 revenue * 65% propensity = $162 expected value (highest), loyalty = $50 value * 20% = $10, survey = $0 value. 4. Agent recommends: 'Send cart abandonment reminder with 10% discount code via email (preferred channel), suppress all other campaigns for 48 hours to avoid fatigue'. 5. Email sent, customer converts (completes purchase), agent updates: 'Success - cart recovered $250, now suppress campaigns for 14 days (purchase cooldown period)'. 6. Sales rep sees agent recommendation: 'Do not contact - customer just made purchase, wait 30 days for upsell timing'. 7. 50-70% response rate improvement (12-15% vs 3-5%), 40-60% contact reduction (2 messages/month vs 5/week), customer satisfaction stable.

Characteristics

• Customer profile and interaction history
• Campaign eligibility rules and business logic
• Propensity models for each action type (response likelihood)
• Revenue potential by action (expected value calculation)
• Contact history and frequency rules (fatigue management)
• Channel preferences (email, SMS, push, direct mail)
• Real-time customer state (cart, browsing, recent purchases)
• Campaign performance data (historical response rates)

Benefits

✓ 50-70% response rate improvement (12-15% vs 3-5%)
✓ 40-60% contact reduction (2/month vs 5/week, reduces fatigue)
✓ Revenue-optimized prioritization ($162 expected value vs guessing)
✓ Cross-channel coordination (marketing and sales aligned)
✓ Fatigue management (suppress campaigns after action taken)
✓ Customer satisfaction maintained (relevant, timely communications)

Is This Right for You?

39% match

This score is based on general applicability (industry fit, implementation complexity, and ROI potential). Use the Preferences button above to set your industry, role, and company profile for personalized matching.

Why this score:

• Applicable across multiple industries
• Higher complexity - requires more resources and planning
• Moderate expected business value
• Time to value: 3-6 months
• (Score based on general applicability - set preferences for personalized matching)

You might benefit from Next Best Action Optimization if:

You're experiencing: Data Quality and Bias: Historical data often contains biases that can skew model predictions.
You're experiencing: Complexity in Measuring Impact: Difficulties in quantifying the true incremental effect of each action before deployment.
You're experiencing: Integration Challenges: Technical complexity in combining multiple data sources and integrating NBA recommendations into existing channels.